README pin: this repo does not target CASE 1.5.0 - #5
Open
forest-savage1234 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Forest Savage <forestsavage03@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
casework/CASE-Utility-RDFDiffhas no CASE or UCO version pin. Live CASE/UCO is 1.5.0. This packet stamps that honesty on the README. It does not rewrite the differ.Files
README.md— oneCASE / UCO pinparagraph after the RDFDiff intro.Out of scope
rdfdiff.py/verify.pyrdflib/rdflib-jsonldinrequirements.txtHow to review
The dest is the new README paragraph. Nothing under
src/changes.I am a volunteer. Thank you for the time. I am trying to become more useful on this work, so I welcome a critical look. If this is the wrong cut, or you want me to stand down, say so and I will recut from notes.